Advanced Energy Industries vs Vicor
AEIS and VICR side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AEIS and VICR compare
Advanced Energy Industries and Vicor are about the same size, with market caps of $8.9B and $8.8B.
Vicor grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (81.8% versus 24.6% for Advanced Energy Industries).
Advanced Energy Industries pays a dividend yielding 0.18%; Vicor does not pay one.
Vicor scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 9 for Advanced Energy Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AEIS | VICR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.9B | $8.8B |
| Share price | $222.06 | $191.09 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.7% | 110% |
| Change, 5 years | 133% | 23.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.45 | 1.98 |
| Employees | 13K | 1,092 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 61.2× |
| P/S | 4.4× (better) | 11.4× |
| P/B | 6.1× (better) | 10.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 26.4× (better) | 76.3× |
| P/FCF | 103× (better) | 172× |
| PEG | – | 0.93 |
| FCF yield | 0.97% (better) | 0.58% |
| Fair value | $172.73 | $108.51 |
| Margin of safety | −28.6% (better) | −76.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.6% | 81.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.9% | 8.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 122% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 115% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 1.9% | 44.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.3% (better) | 34.8% |
| Operating margin | 13.2% (better) | 11.5% |
| Net margin | – | 18.8% |
| FCF margin | 4.3% | 6.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 20.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 19.8% | 27.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.87 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.40 | – |
| Interest coverage | 17.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.79 | 13.25 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.71 | 91.53 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.08% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.26% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 47.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 46.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$34.4M (better) | −$399M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 9.7% |
Go deeper
- AEIS stock overview
- AEIS income statement
- AEIS valuation and score
- VICR stock overview
- VICR income statement
- VICR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.