MACOM Technology Solutions vs Semtech
MTSI and SMTC side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MTSI and SMTC compare
MACOM Technology Solutions is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Semtech ($17.9B against $11.9B).
On earnings, MACOM Technology Solutions is cheaper: it trades at 74.9× trailing earnings, against 84.4× for Semtech.
MACOM Technology Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (28.4% versus 17.8% for Semtech).
MACOM Technology Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.7% compared with 13.1% at Semtech.
MACOM Technology Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 8 for Semtech), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MTSI | SMTC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $17.9B | $11.9B |
| Share price | $234.39 | $127.38 |
| Change, 1 year | 53.5% | 83.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 219% | 41.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.48 | 1.79 |
| Employees | 2,000 | 1,920 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 74.9× (better) | 84.4× |
| P/S | 15.4× | 10.1× (better) |
| P/B | 11.6× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 66.9× (better) | 129× |
| P/FCF | 87.7× | 61.6× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.1% | 1.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $123.70 | $39.82 |
| Margin of safety | −89.5% (better) | −220% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 28.4% (better) | 17.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.8% (better) | 12.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 546% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 421% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.5% (better) | 52.1% |
| Operating margin | 18.1% (better) | 8.0% |
| Net margin | 20.7% (better) | 13.1% |
| FCF margin | 17.5% (better) | 16.4% |
| Return on equity | 17.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 15.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.22 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.23 | 3.06 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.0× |
| Current ratio | 2.34 (better) | 1.70 |
| Altman Z-score | 18.94 (better) | 8.85 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.9% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 6.7% | 0.51% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$320M | −$17.5M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.8% | 6.7% |
Go deeper
- MTSI stock overview
- MTSI income statement
- MTSI valuation and score
- SMTC stock overview
- SMTC income statement
- SMTC valuation and score
Other comparisons
- ALAB vs SMTC
- CRDO vs SMTC
- FORM vs MTSI
- FORM vs SMTC
- LSCC vs MTSI
- MTSI vs VIAV
- MTSI vs VICR
- MXL vs SMTC
- SLAB vs SMTC
- SMTC vs VIAV
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.