MACOM Technology Solutions vs Vicor
MTSI and VICR side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MTSI and VICR compare
MACOM Technology Solutions is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Vicor ($17.9B against $8.8B).
On earnings, Vicor is cheaper: it trades at 61.2× trailing earnings, against 74.9× for MACOM Technology Solutions.
Vicor grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (81.8% versus 28.4% for MACOM Technology Solutions).
MACOM Technology Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.7% compared with 18.8% at Vicor.
Vicor scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 13 for MACOM Technology Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MTSI | VICR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $17.9B | $8.8B |
| Share price | $234.39 | $191.09 |
| Change, 1 year | 53.5% | 110% |
| Change, 5 years | 219% | 23.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.48 | 1.98 |
| Employees | 2,000 | 1,092 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 74.9× | 61.2× (better) |
| P/S | 15.4× | 11.4× (better) |
| P/B | 11.6× | 10.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 66.9× (better) | 76.3× |
| P/FCF | 87.7× (better) | 172× |
| PEG | – | 0.93 |
| FCF yield | 1.1% (better) | 0.58% |
| Fair value | $123.70 | $108.51 |
| Margin of safety | −89.5% | −76.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 28.4% | 81.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.8% (better) | 8.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 122% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 115% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 44.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.5% (better) | 34.8% |
| Operating margin | 18.1% (better) | 11.5% |
| Net margin | 20.7% (better) | 18.8% |
| FCF margin | 17.5% (better) | 6.6% |
| Return on equity | 17.2% | 20.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 15.8% | 27.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.22 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.23 | – |
| Current ratio | 2.34 | 13.25 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 18.94 | 91.53 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.9% | 47.6% |
| Held by insiders | 6.7% | 46.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$320M (better) | −$399M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.8% | 9.7% |
Go deeper
- MTSI stock overview
- MTSI income statement
- MTSI valuation and score
- VICR stock overview
- VICR income statement
- VICR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.