Agree Realty vs Federal Realty Investment Trust
ADC and FRT side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ADC and FRT compare
Agree Realty and Federal Realty Investment Trust are about the same size, with market caps of $8.3B and $9.6B.
On earnings, Federal Realty Investment Trust is cheaper: it trades at 19.2× trailing earnings, against 36.1× for Agree Realty.
Agree Realty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.2% versus 7.4% for Federal Realty Investment Trust).
Federal Realty Investment Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 38.6% compared with 28.8% at Agree Realty.
Both pay dividends: Agree Realty yields 4.7% and Federal Realty Investment Trust 4.1%.
Federal Realty Investment Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 12 for Agree Realty), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ADC | FRT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.3B | $9.6B |
| Share price | $67.07 | $110.19 |
| Change, 1 year | −8.2% | 15.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −5.4% | −16.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.30 | 0.76 |
| Employees | 90 | 314 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 36.1× | 19.2× (better) |
| P/S | 10.7× | 7.3× (better) |
| P/B | 1.3× (better) | 2.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.1× | 8.8× (better) |
| Fair value | $59.27 | $124.79 |
| Margin of safety | −13.2% | 11.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 18.2% (better) | 7.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 23.6% (better) | 8.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 21.0% | 67.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 10.7% | 64.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 0.34% | 23.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 47.9% | 53.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 28.8% | 38.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 3.7% | 15.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.9% | 17.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 2.5× | 3.7× (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.42 | 1.44 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.7% (better) | 4.1% |
| Payout ratio | 162% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | 13 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 1.0% |
| Buyback yield | −11.8% | 0.00% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −7.1% | 4.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 115% | 98.4% |
| Held by insiders | 1.8% | 0.93% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $9.9M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.3% | 5.5% |
Go deeper
- ADC stock overview
- ADC income statement
- ADC valuation and score
- FRT stock overview
- FRT income statement
- FRT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.