StockData

ACI Worldwide vs Jack Henry & Associates

ACIW and JKHY side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ACIW and JKHY compare

Jack Henry & Associates is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as ACI Worldwide ($11.3B against $5.7B).

On earnings, Jack Henry & Associates is cheaper: it trades at 23.1× trailing earnings, against 25.8× for ACI Worldwide.

Jack Henry & Associates grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.1% versus 7.0% for ACI Worldwide).

Jack Henry & Associates keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.8% compared with 12.4% at ACI Worldwide.

Jack Henry & Associates pays a dividend yielding 1.5%; ACI Worldwide does not pay one.

Jack Henry & Associates scores higher on the StockData Score (24 against 13 for ACI Worldwide), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricACIWJKHY
Size and price
Market cap$5.7B$11.3B
Share price$56.34$161.34
Change, 1 year19.0%7.6%
Change, 5 years74.2%1.9%
Beta (5Y)1.010.45
Employees2,9307,300
StockData Score
Total score1324 (better)
Valuation score14 (better)
Growth score24 (better)
Performance score56 (better)
Health score56 (better)
Dividend score04 (better)
Valuation
P/E25.8×23.1× (better)
P/S3.1× (better)4.4×
P/B3.8× (better)5.5×
EV/EBITDA14.5× (better)17.8×
P/FCF18.3×16.3× (better)
PEG1.27 (better)1.99
FCF yield5.5%6.1% (better)
Fair value$52.05$182.31
Margin of safety−8.3%11.5% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)7.0%7.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average6.3%7.7% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−10.1%10.3% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−8.0%11.9% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average28.4% (better)11.1%
Profitability
Gross margin49.1% (better)43.7%
Operating margin18.6%25.0% (better)
Net margin12.4%19.8% (better)
FCF margin17.1%27.3% (better)
Return on equity15.6%24.0% (better)
Return on invested capital11.7%24.0% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.55 (better)0.00
Net debt / EBITDA1.50–
Interest coverage6.4×–
Current ratio1.58 (better)1.17
Altman Z-score4.109.36 (better)
Piotroski F-score78 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–1.5%
Payout ratio–33.9%
Years of dividend growth–17
Dividend growth, 5Y average–6.0%
Buyback yield3.0%3.9% (better)
Shareholder yield3.0%5.4% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions103%99.1%
Held by insiders1.9%0.61%
Insider net buying, 12 months$22.7K (better)−$3.2M
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float6.5%6.9%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.