Targa Resources vs Venture Global
TRGP and VG side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TRGP and VG compare
Targa Resources is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Venture Global ($62.6B against $31.7B).
On earnings, Venture Global is cheaper: it trades at 6.1× trailing earnings, against 25.8× for Targa Resources.
Venture Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (69.4% versus 4.7% for Targa Resources).
Both pay dividends: Targa Resources yields 1.2% and Venture Global 0.73%.
Targa Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for Venture Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TRGP | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $62.6B | $31.7B |
| Share price | $291.78 | $12.66 |
| Change, 1 year | 72.2% | 49.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 445% | 22.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.65 | 0.41 |
| Employees | 3,570 | 2,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.8× | 6.1× (better) |
| P/S | 3.4× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | 16.4× | 2.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.1× | 9.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 67.0× | – |
| PEG | 0.86 | – |
| FCF yield | 1.5% (better) | −23.7% |
| Fair value | $230.16 | $27.00 |
| Margin of safety | −26.8% | 53.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.7% | 69.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.6% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 41.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 52.4% | 165% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 41.8% | 55.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 22.5% | 40.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 13.5% | – |
| FCF margin | 5.1% (better) | −40.9% |
| Return on equity | 75.0% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 15.3% (better) | 13.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 5.05 | 4.03 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.29 (better) | 4.92 |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.9× |
| Current ratio | 0.74 | 0.90 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.66 (better) | 1.15 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% (better) | 0.73% |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 25.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.36% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.6% (better) | 0.73% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.1% | 18.4% |
| Held by insiders | 1.3% | 81.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$30.8M (better) | −$403M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.1% | 10.7% |
Go deeper
- TRGP stock overview
- TRGP income statement
- TRGP valuation and score
- VG stock overview
- VG income statement
- VG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.