Invitation Homes vs Mid America Apartment Communities
INVH and MAA side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How INVH and MAA compare
Invitation Homes and Mid America Apartment Communities are about the same size, with market caps of $15.5B and $13.7B.
On earnings, Invitation Homes is cheaper: it trades at 23.6× trailing earnings, against 35.7× for Mid America Apartment Communities.
Invitation Homes grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.2% versus 0.96% for Mid America Apartment Communities).
Invitation Homes keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 23.5% compared with 17.4% at Mid America Apartment Communities.
Both pay dividends: Invitation Homes yields 4.5% and Mid America Apartment Communities 5.2%.
Invitation Homes scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for Mid America Apartment Communities), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | INVH | MAA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $15.5B | $13.7B |
| Share price | $26.85 | $117.89 |
| Change, 1 year | −7.1% | −10.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −34.4% | −41.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.69 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 1,725 | 2,507 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.6× (better) | 35.7× |
| P/S | 5.3× (better) | 6.1× |
| P/B | 1.8× (better) | 2.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.8× |
| PEG | 1.56 | – |
| Fair value | $32.91 | $106.77 |
| Margin of safety | 18.4% (better) | −10.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.2% (better) | 0.96% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.4% (better) | 5.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 16.4% (better) | −30.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 20.0% (better) | −30.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 22.4% (better) | 11.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 23.5% (better) | 17.4% |
| Return on equity | 7.4% (better) | 7.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.99 | 1.43 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.5% | 5.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 105% | 184% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 8 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 14.3% (better) | 8.7% |
| Buyback yield | 5.5% (better) | 1.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 10.0% (better) | 6.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 97.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.42% | 0.66% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$823K |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.4% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- INVH stock overview
- INVH income statement
- INVH valuation and score
- MAA stock overview
- MAA income statement
- MAA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.