BXP vs Mid America Apartment Communities
BXP and MAA side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BXP and MAA compare
Mid America Apartment Communities is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as BXP ($13.7B against $10.1B).
On earnings, BXP is cheaper: it trades at 34.1× trailing earnings, against 35.8× for Mid America Apartment Communities.
BXP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.9% versus 0.96% for Mid America Apartment Communities).
Mid America Apartment Communities keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.4% compared with 8.4% at BXP.
Both pay dividends: BXP yields 4.4% and Mid America Apartment Communities 5.2%.
Mid America Apartment Communities scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for BXP), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BXP | MAA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.1B | $13.7B |
| Share price | $63.44 | $118.19 |
| Change, 1 year | −11.4% | −8.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −45.8% | −41.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.98 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 714 | 2,507 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 34.1× (better) | 35.8× |
| P/S | 2.9× (better) | 6.2× |
| P/B | 2.0× (better) | 2.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.8× |
| Fair value | $60.66 | $107.53 |
| Margin of safety | −4.6% (better) | −9.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.9% (better) | 0.96% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.7% | 5.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 5922% (better) | −30.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 4550% (better) | −30.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −20.7% | 11.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 59.1% | – |
| Net margin | 8.4% | 17.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 5.7% | 7.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.15 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.39 | 1.43 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.4% | 5.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 184% | 184% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 8.7% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.4% | 6.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 117% | 97.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.21% | 0.66% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.2M | −$823K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.0% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- BXP stock overview
- BXP income statement
- BXP valuation and score
- MAA stock overview
- MAA income statement
- MAA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.