Kimco Realty vs Mid America Apartment Communities
KIM and MAA side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KIM and MAA compare
Kimco Realty is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Mid America Apartment Communities ($17.0B against $13.7B).
On earnings, Kimco Realty is cheaper: it trades at 23.9× trailing earnings, against 35.7× for Mid America Apartment Communities.
Kimco Realty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.5% versus 0.96% for Mid America Apartment Communities).
Kimco Realty keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.1% compared with 17.4% at Mid America Apartment Communities.
Both pay dividends: Kimco Realty yields 4.1% and Mid America Apartment Communities 5.2%.
Kimco Realty scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 8 for Mid America Apartment Communities), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KIM | MAA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $17.0B | $13.7B |
| Share price | $25.55 | $117.89 |
| Change, 1 year | 24.1% | −10.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 7.0% | −41.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.81 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 710 | 2,507 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.9× (better) | 35.7× |
| P/S | 7.7× | 6.1× (better) |
| P/B | 1.7× (better) | 2.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.1× | 10.8× (better) |
| Fair value | $24.75 | $106.77 |
| Margin of safety | −3.2% (better) | −10.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.5% (better) | 0.96% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.1% (better) | 5.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 24.8% (better) | −30.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 28.9% (better) | −30.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 11.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 40.1% | – |
| Net margin | 34.1% (better) | 17.4% |
| Return on equity | 7.3% (better) | 7.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 2.6× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.31 | 1.43 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.1% | 5.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 184% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 8 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.3% (better) | 8.7% |
| Buyback yield | 1.9% (better) | 1.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.0% | 6.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 97.1% |
| Held by insiders | 2.3% | 0.66% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$199K (better) | −$823K |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.2% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- KIM stock overview
- KIM income statement
- KIM valuation and score
- MAA stock overview
- MAA income statement
- MAA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.