Essex Property Trust vs Mid America Apartment Communities
ESS and MAA side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ESS and MAA compare
Essex Property Trust is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Mid America Apartment Communities ($17.5B against $13.5B).
On earnings, Mid America Apartment Communities is cheaper: it trades at 35.3× trailing earnings, against 50.4× for Essex Property Trust.
Essex Property Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.5% versus 0.96% for Mid America Apartment Communities).
Both pay dividends: Essex Property Trust yields 3.8% and Mid America Apartment Communities 5.3%.
Mid America Apartment Communities scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for Essex Property Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ESS | MAA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $17.5B | $13.5B |
| Share price | $271.80 | $116.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 3.9% | −11.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −21.8% | −42.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.68 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 1,689 | 2,507 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 50.4× | 35.3× (better) |
| P/S | 9.0× | 6.1× (better) |
| P/B | 3.3× | 2.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.8× | 10.7× (better) |
| PEG | 2.74 | – |
| Fair value | $186.02 | $107.11 |
| Margin of safety | −46.1% | −8.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.5% (better) | 0.96% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.8% | 5.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −30.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −59.0% | −30.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 3.7% | 11.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 70.1% | – |
| Operating margin | 29.5% | – |
| Net margin | – | 17.4% |
| Return on equity | – | 7.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 2.2× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.73 (better) | 1.41 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.8% | 5.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 184% |
| Years of dividend growth | 9 (better) | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.3% | 8.7% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.35% | 1.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.2% | 6.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 97.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.73% | 0.66% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$168K (better) | −$823K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.6% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- ESS stock overview
- ESS income statement
- ESS valuation and score
- MAA stock overview
- MAA income statement
- MAA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.