Intel vs Texas Instruments
INTC and TXN side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How INTC and TXN compare
Intel and Texas Instruments are about the same size, with market caps of $317B and $277B.
Texas Instruments grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.3% versus 12.1% for Intel).
Texas Instruments keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.3% compared with −20.1% at Intel.
Texas Instruments pays a dividend yielding 1.9%; Intel does not pay one.
Texas Instruments scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 6 for Intel), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | INTC | TXN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $317B | $277B |
| Share price | $59.66 | $303.60 |
| Change, 1 year | 57.5% | 86.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 20.5% | 55.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.66 | 1.13 |
| Employees | 109K | 33K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 39.4× |
| P/S | 5.3× (better) | 13.4× |
| P/B | 2.8× (better) | 14.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 187× | 33.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 84.2× | 37.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.2% | 2.6% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $226.32 |
| Margin of safety | – | −34.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.1% | 20.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −7.5% | 4.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −6177% | 41.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −24200% | 41.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −1.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.9% | 60.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.9% | 40.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −20.1% | 34.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.3% | 35.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | −10.9% | 39.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.2% | 29.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.44 (better) | 0.71 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −2.20 | 0.64 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.21 | 5.59 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.71 | 13.27 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.9% |
| Payout ratio | – | 72.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 8.1% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.23% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 66.3% | 89.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.07% | 0.16% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $12.5M (better) | −$124M |
| Superinvestors holding | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.9% | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- INTC stock overview
- INTC income statement
- INTC valuation and score
- TXN stock overview
- TXN income statement
- TXN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.