Intel vs Nvidia
INTC and NVDA side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How INTC and NVDA compare
Nvidia is the larger company, worth 13 times as much as Intel ($4.2T against $332B).
Nvidia grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (83.4% versus 12.1% for Intel).
Nvidia keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 63.7% compared with −20.1% at Intel.
Nvidia pays a dividend yielding 0.30%; Intel does not pay one.
Nvidia scores higher on the StockData Score (26 against 6 for Intel), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | INTC | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $332B | $4.2T |
| Share price | $62.50 | $173.73 |
| Change, 1 year | 62.5% | −12.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 26.2% | 427% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.67 | 2.04 |
| Employees | 109K | 42K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 26 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 22.0× |
| P/S | 5.5× (better) | 13.8× |
| P/B | 2.9× (better) | 18.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 196× | 20.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 88.2× | 33.0× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.11 |
| FCF yield | 1.1% | 3.0% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $306.55 |
| Margin of safety | – | 43.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.1% | 83.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −7.5% | 66.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −6177% | 123% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −24200% | 125% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 95.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.9% | 74.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.9% | 65.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −20.1% | 63.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.3% | 41.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | −10.9% | 117% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.2% | 114% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.44 | 0.15 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −2.20 | 0.05 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.5× | 427× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.21 | 4.59 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.81 | 32.04 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.30% |
| Payout ratio | – | 3.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 20.1% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 66.3% | 69.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.07% | 3.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $12.5M (better) | −$1.9B |
| Superinvestors holding | 6 | 11 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.9% | 1.2% |
Go deeper
- INTC stock overview
- INTC income statement
- INTC valuation and score
- NVDA stock overview
- NVDA income statement
- NVDA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.