Intel vs Texas Instruments
INTC and TXN side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How INTC and TXN compare
Intel is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Texas Instruments ($332B against $275B).
Texas Instruments grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.7% versus 7.5% for Intel).
Texas Instruments keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 31.1% compared with −19.8% at Intel.
Texas Instruments pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Intel does not pay one.
Texas Instruments scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 4 for Intel), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | INTC | TXN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $332B | $275B |
| Share price | $65.76 | $300.84 |
| Change, 1 year | 59.1% | 87.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 29.1% | 55.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.59 | 1.12 |
| Employees | 109K | 33K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 45.8× |
| P/S | 5.8× (better) | 14.1× |
| P/B | 3.8× (better) | 15.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 38.8× |
| P/FCF | 117× | 51.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.85% | 1.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $42.48 | $190.34 |
| Margin of safety | −54.8% (better) | −58.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.5% | 16.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −7.5% | 4.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 20.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 20.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −1.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.6% | 58.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | −0.14% | 37.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −19.8% | 31.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.0% | 27.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | −12.2% | 35.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −0.05% | 25.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.58 (better) | 0.78 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.97 |
| Interest coverage | −0.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.60 | 4.86 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.65 | 12.92 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 84.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 8.1% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.26% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.9% | 89.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.07% | 0.16% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $2.8M (better) | −$119M |
| Superinvestors holding | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.3% | 2.2% |
Go deeper
- INTC stock overview
- INTC income statement
- INTC valuation and score
- TXN stock overview
- TXN income statement
- TXN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.