Amphenol vs Texas Instruments
APH and TXN side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How APH and TXN compare
Texas Instruments is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Amphenol ($283B against $196B).
On earnings, Amphenol is cheaper: it trades at 34.6× trailing earnings, against 40.2× for Texas Instruments.
Amphenol grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (57.6% versus 20.3% for Texas Instruments).
Texas Instruments keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.3% compared with 18.0% at Amphenol.
Both pay dividends: Amphenol yields 0.63% and Texas Instruments 1.9%.
Amphenol scores higher on the StockData Score (23 against 15 for Texas Instruments), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | APH | TXN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $196B | $283B |
| Share price | $79.31 | $309.81 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.3% | 92.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 273% | 58.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 1.14 |
| Employees | 170K | 33K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 23 (better) | 15 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 34.6× (better) | 40.2× |
| P/S | 5.9× (better) | 13.6× |
| P/B | 11.4× (better) | 14.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.7× (better) | 34.1× |
| P/FCF | 38.2× (better) | 38.7× |
| PEG | 1.16 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.6% (better) | 2.6% |
| Fair value | $85.54 | $225.01 |
| Margin of safety | 7.3% (better) | −37.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 57.6% (better) | 20.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.8% (better) | 4.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 55.2% (better) | 41.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 53.0% (better) | 41.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 27.8% (better) | −1.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.8% | 60.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 27.7% | 40.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 18.0% | 34.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 15.5% | 35.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 40.0% (better) | 39.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 27.8% | 29.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.04 | 0.71 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.19 | 0.64 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 12.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.94 | 5.59 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 5.93 | 13.46 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.63% | 1.9% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 18.9% | 72.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 14 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 23.4% (better) | 8.1% |
| Buyback yield | 0.41% (better) | 0.22% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.0% | 2.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.7% | 89.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.27% | 0.16% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$406M | −$124M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 8 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.1% | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- APH stock overview
- APH income statement
- APH valuation and score
- TXN stock overview
- TXN income statement
- TXN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.