EQT vs Expand Energy
EQT and EXE side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EQT and EXE compare
EQT is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Expand Energy ($32.5B against $20.5B).
On earnings, Expand Energy is cheaper: it trades at 7.7× trailing earnings, against 12.3× for EQT.
Expand Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (28.2% versus 18.6% for EQT).
EQT keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.4% compared with 19.8% at Expand Energy.
Both pay dividends: EQT yields 0.95% and Expand Energy 3.2%.
EQT scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 16 for Expand Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EQT | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $32.5B | $20.5B |
| Share price | $52.00 | $88.63 |
| Change, 1 year | −10.3% | −22.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 150% | 43.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 0.60 |
| Employees | 1,523 | 1,600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 16 |
| Valuation score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.3× | 7.7× (better) |
| P/S | 3.5× | 1.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.3× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3× | 3.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 8.6× | 7.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 11.7% | 12.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $56.56 | $100.71 |
| Margin of safety | 8.1% | 12.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 18.6% | 28.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 23.1% (better) | 18.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 49.1% | 218% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 45.0% | 228% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 83.5% | – |
| Operating margin | 41.8% (better) | 25.7% |
| Net margin | 28.4% (better) | 19.8% |
| FCF margin | 40.7% (better) | 18.6% |
| Return on equity | 10.9% | 14.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 9.8% | 12.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.22 (better) | 0.24 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.83 | 0.69 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 11.2× | 17.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.71 | 0.90 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.29 | 2.32 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.95% | 3.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 15.5% | 19.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 84.3% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 4.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.95% | 7.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.3% | 95.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.69% | 0.33% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$20.7M | $877K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.9% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- EQT stock overview
- EQT income statement
- EQT valuation and score
- EXE stock overview
- EXE income statement
- EXE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.