Crown Castle vs SBA Communications
CCI and SBAC side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CCI and SBAC compare
Crown Castle is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as SBA Communications ($38.6B against $20.1B).
On earnings, SBA Communications is cheaper: it trades at 20.4× trailing earnings, against 47.8× for Crown Castle.
SBA Communications grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.3% versus −5.3% for Crown Castle).
SBA Communications keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.5% compared with 20.1% at Crown Castle.
Both pay dividends: Crown Castle yields 4.7% and SBA Communications 2.6%.
SBA Communications scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 7 for Crown Castle), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CCI | SBAC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $38.6B | $20.1B |
| Share price | $90.83 | $189.35 |
| Change, 1 year | −3.0% | −6.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −50.6% | −45.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.57 | 0.71 |
| Employees | 4,000 | 1,844 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 47.8× | 20.4× (better) |
| P/S | 9.5× | 7.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.5× | 19.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 22.4× | 19.1× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.63 |
| FCF yield | 4.5% | 5.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $63.17 | $219.66 |
| Margin of safety | −43.8% | 13.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.3% | 2.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −6.1% | 6.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 15.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 16.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −15.5% | 116% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 97.9% (better) | 75.7% |
| Operating margin | 47.1% | 47.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 20.1% | 34.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 42.2% (better) | 36.9% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 15.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.75 (better) | 7.37 |
| Interest coverage | 2.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.23 (better) | 0.20 |
| Altman Z-score | −0.09 | 0.12 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.7% (better) | 2.6% |
| Payout ratio | −281% | 52.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −0.74% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.3% (better) | 2.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.4% | 98.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.11% | 0.63% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.1M | −$54.8K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.3% | 3.2% |
Go deeper
- CCI stock overview
- CCI income statement
- CCI valuation and score
- SBAC stock overview
- SBAC income statement
- SBAC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.