American Tower vs Crown Castle
AMT and CCI side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMT and CCI compare
American Tower is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Crown Castle ($88.9B against $38.6B).
On earnings, American Tower is cheaper: it trades at 27.0× trailing earnings, against 47.8× for Crown Castle.
American Tower grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.3% versus −5.3% for Crown Castle).
Both pay dividends: American Tower yields 3.7% and Crown Castle 4.7%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMT | CCI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $88.9B | $38.6B |
| Share price | $191.64 | $90.83 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.5% | −3.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −26.6% | −50.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.59 | 0.57 |
| Employees | 4,866 | 4,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 7 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 27.0× (better) | 47.8× |
| P/S | 8.1× (better) | 9.5× |
| P/B | 25.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.7× (better) | 21.5× |
| P/FCF | 22.4× | 22.4× (better) |
| PEG | 2.21 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.5% | 4.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $180.30 | $63.17 |
| Margin of safety | −6.3% (better) | −43.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.3% (better) | −5.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.8% (better) | −6.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 13.3% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.3% (better) | −15.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 97.9% |
| Operating margin | 44.8% | 47.1% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 20.1% |
| FCF margin | 36.0% | 42.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 10.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 10.69 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.10 (better) | 6.75 |
| Interest coverage | 3.5× (better) | 2.2× |
| Current ratio | 0.35 (better) | 0.23 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.21 (better) | −0.09 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.7% | 4.7% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | −281% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −0.74% |
| Buyback yield | 0.98% | 2.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.7% | 7.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.9% | 99.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.09% | 0.11% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$22.6M | −$1.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.4% | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- AMT stock overview
- AMT income statement
- AMT valuation and score
- CCI stock overview
- CCI income statement
- CCI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.