Crown Castle vs Extra Space Storage
CCI and EXR side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CCI and EXR compare
Crown Castle is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Extra Space Storage ($38.6B against $33.1B).
On earnings, Extra Space Storage is cheaper: it trades at 32.2× trailing earnings, against 47.8× for Crown Castle.
Extra Space Storage grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.1% versus −5.3% for Crown Castle).
Extra Space Storage keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.9% compared with 20.1% at Crown Castle.
Both pay dividends: Crown Castle yields 4.7% and Extra Space Storage 4.1%.
Extra Space Storage scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 7 for Crown Castle), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CCI | EXR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $38.6B | $33.1B |
| Share price | $90.83 | $158.50 |
| Change, 1 year | −3.0% | 19.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −50.6% | −21.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.57 | 0.83 |
| Employees | 4,000 | 8,393 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 47.8× | 32.2× (better) |
| P/S | 9.5× (better) | 9.5× |
| P/B | – | 2.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.5× | 14.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 22.4× | 21.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.5% | 4.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $63.17 | $124.78 |
| Margin of safety | −43.8% | −27.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.3% | 4.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −6.1% | 20.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 9.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 5.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −15.5% | 4.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 97.9% (better) | 73.0% |
| Operating margin | 47.1% (better) | 43.8% |
| Net margin | 20.1% | 29.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 42.2% | 44.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 7.9% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 11.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.75 | – |
| Interest coverage | 2.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.23 | – |
| Altman Z-score | −0.09 | 1.50 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.7% (better) | 4.1% |
| Payout ratio | −281% | 132% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −0.74% | 12.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 2.6% (better) | 1.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.3% (better) | 5.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.4% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 0.11% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.1M (better) | −$2.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.3% | 2.4% |
Go deeper
- CCI stock overview
- CCI income statement
- CCI valuation and score
- EXR stock overview
- EXR income statement
- EXR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.