StockData
Marriott International Inc logo

Marriott International Inc

MARNasdaqHotels & MotelsFiscal year ends December 31
Financials through Q3 FY2026, quarter ended Sep 30, 2026Last filing: 10-Q on Nov 2, 2026Score 9/30100% above fair value
$416.38+0.08 (+0.02%)

Close on Nov 3, 2026Market cap $108.58BP/E 41.6Yield 0.63%

Marriott International Location-based Scope 2 GHG Emissions by Year

Location-based Scope 2 GHG Emissions (metric tons CO2e)

Marriott International Location-based Scope 2 GHG Emissions: 5,358,226 in FY2025, down 0.2% from a year earlier.

Latest, FY2025
5,358,226
Period ended Dec 31, 2025
Change on a year earlier
-0.2%
5,370,293 in FY2024
History
7 years
Since FY2019
Sources
1
Marriott International SEC Filings

Where the FY2025 figure comes from

“Asia Pacific excluding China 733 482 230 21 157,326 Scope 2: Location-based 5,299,482 5,370,293 5,358,226”

Source: Marriott International SEC Filings ↗

Reported in Marriott Serve 360 ESG Report — Performance Tables (FY2018..FY2025).

Annual history

Hover a value to see the sentence it was read from; calculated values show their formula

PeriodEndedLocation-based Scope 2 GHG Emissions (metric tons CO2e)Year on yearSource
FY2025Dec 31, 20255,358,226-0.2%Marriott International SEC Filings ↗
FY2024Dec 31, 20245,370,293+4.0%Marriott International SEC Filings ↗
FY2023Dec 31, 20235,161,693+7.4%Marriott International SEC Filings ↗
FY2022Dec 31, 20224,806,946+2.1%Marriott International SEC Filings ↗
FY2021Dec 31, 20214,708,713+13.4%Marriott International SEC Filings ↗
FY2020Dec 31, 20204,152,757-21.6%Marriott International SEC Filings ↗
FY2019Dec 31, 20195,299,482–Marriott International SEC Filings ↗

Cite this data

StockData. (2026). Marriott International Location-based Scope 2 GHG Emissions, annual FY2019–FY2025 [Data set]. Compiled from Marriott International SEC filings and investor materials. https://stockdatahq.com/stocks/mar/kpis/esg-ghg-scope2-loc

See every metric in the Marriott International KPI table. Data updated Oct 26, 2026.

See a number that looks wrong?