Atour Lifestyle vs Marriott International
ATAT and MAR side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ATAT and MAR compare
Atour Lifestyle grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (35.1% versus 4.7% for Marriott International).
Atour Lifestyle keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.6% compared with 9.6% at Marriott International.
Marriott International pays a dividend yielding 0.70%; Atour Lifestyle does not pay one.
Atour Lifestyle scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 10 for Marriott International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ATAT | MAR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $104B |
| Share price | $32.52 | $399.30 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.0% | 51.8% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 138% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 6,356 | 148K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 41.4× |
| P/S | – | 3.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 28.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 33.2× |
| PEG | – | 4.35 |
| FCF yield | – | 3.0% |
| Fair value | – | $198.69 |
| Margin of safety | – | −101% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 35.1% (better) | 4.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 44.3% (better) | 19.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 27.1% (better) | 4.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 26.5% (better) | 8.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 23.6% (better) | 15.8% |
| Net margin | 16.6% (better) | 9.6% |
| FCF margin | 19.5% (better) | 11.6% |
| Return on equity | 49.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | – | 26.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.07 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −2.38 | 3.87 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 543× (better) | 5.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.97 (better) | 0.53 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 4.19 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.70% |
| Payout ratio | 47.6% | 28.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 40.6% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.4% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 4.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 19.0% | 62.2% |
| Held by insiders | 19.4% | 13.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$66.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 4 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 3.0% |
Go deeper
- ATAT stock overview
- ATAT income statement
- ATAT valuation and score
- MAR stock overview
- MAR income statement
- MAR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.