Teradata vs Unity Software
TDC and U side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TDC and U compare
Unity Software is the larger company, worth 5.2 times as much as Teradata ($16.6B against $3.2B).
Unity Software grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.0% versus 0.96% for Teradata).
Teradata keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 27.1% compared with −29.0% at Unity Software.
Teradata scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 3 for Unity Software), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TDC | U |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.2B | $16.6B |
| Share price | $34.25 | $37.70 |
| Change, 1 year | 62.8% | 1.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −29.9% | −75.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 2.60 |
| Employees | 5,100 | 4,412 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.2× | – |
| P/S | 1.9× (better) | 8.2× |
| P/B | 5.4× (better) | 5.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.5× | – |
| P/FCF | 4.3× (better) | 30.8× |
| PEG | 0.11 | – |
| FCF yield | 23.1% (better) | 3.2% |
| Fair value | $38.38 | $24.28 |
| Margin of safety | 10.8% (better) | −55.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.96% | 14.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.0% | 19.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 316% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 320% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 3.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 60.8% | 64.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 7.5% (better) | −30.4% |
| Net margin | 27.1% (better) | −29.0% |
| FCF margin | 43.5% (better) | 26.5% |
| Return on equity | 119% (better) | −18.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 43.5% (better) | −44.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.86 | – |
| Interest coverage | 5.1× (better) | −25.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.91 | 2.03 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.65 | 2.31 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 4.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.5% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 132% | 84.7% |
| Held by insiders | 20.1% | 20.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$10.1M (better) | −$86.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 19.5% | 8.0% |
Go deeper
- TDC stock overview
- TDC income statement
- TDC valuation and score
- U stock overview
- U income statement
- U valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.