Figma vs Unity Software
FIG and U side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FIG and U compare
Unity Software is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Figma ($16.6B against $11.5B).
Figma grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (43.4% versus 14.0% for Unity Software).
Unity Software keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −29.0% compared with −123% at Figma.
Figma scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 3 for Unity Software), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FIG | U |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.5B | $16.6B |
| Share price | $21.65 | $37.70 |
| Change, 1 year | −57.4% | 1.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 170% | −75.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.80 | 2.60 |
| Employees | – | 4,412 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 9.0× | 8.2× (better) |
| P/B | 7.8× | 5.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 49.7× | 30.8× (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.0% | 3.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $6.82 | $24.28 |
| Margin of safety | −218% | −55.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 43.4% (better) | 14.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 19.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −1116% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −947% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 79.1% (better) | 64.9% |
| Operating margin | −124% | −30.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −123% | −29.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 18.1% | 26.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | −109% | −18.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | −44.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −25.5× |
| Current ratio | 2.45 (better) | 2.03 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.83 (better) | 2.31 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.0% | 84.7% |
| Held by insiders | 45.7% | 20.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$256M | −$86.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.1% | 8.0% |
Go deeper
- FIG stock overview
- FIG income statement
- FIG valuation and score
- U stock overview
- U income statement
- U valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.