Take Two Interactive Software vs Unity Software
TTWO and U side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TTWO and U compare
Take Two Interactive Software is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Unity Software ($35.6B against $16.6B).
Take Two Interactive Software grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.3% versus 14.0% for Unity Software).
Take Two Interactive Software keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −4.8% compared with −29.0% at Unity Software.
Take Two Interactive Software scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 3 for Unity Software), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TTWO | U |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $35.6B | $16.6B |
| Share price | $190.17 | $37.70 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.5% | 1.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 1.6% | −75.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.81 | 2.60 |
| Employees | 13K | 4,412 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 5.3× (better) | 8.2× |
| P/B | 9.9× | 5.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 1036× | – |
| P/FCF | 105× | 30.8× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.95% | 3.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $112.12 | $24.28 |
| Margin of safety | −69.6% | −55.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.3% (better) | 14.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.6% | 19.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.0% | 64.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −2.4% (better) | −30.4% |
| Net margin | −4.8% (better) | −29.0% |
| FCF margin | 5.0% | 26.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | −9.0% (better) | −18.9% |
| Return on invested capital | −2.9% (better) | −44.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.70 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 19.80 | – |
| Interest coverage | −1.1× (better) | −25.5× |
| Current ratio | 1.06 | 2.03 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.47 (better) | 2.31 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −0.17% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −0.17% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.2% | 84.7% |
| Held by insiders | 2.1% | 20.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$163M | −$86.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.1% | 8.0% |
Go deeper
- TTWO stock overview
- TTWO income statement
- TTWO valuation and score
- U stock overview
- U income statement
- U valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.