Skyworks Solutions vs Vishay Intertechnology
SWKS and VSH side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SWKS and VSH compare
Skyworks Solutions is the larger company, worth 3.3 times as much as Vishay Intertechnology ($13.5B against $4.1B).
On earnings, Vishay Intertechnology is cheaper: it trades at 42.9× trailing earnings, against 78.9× for Skyworks Solutions.
Vishay Intertechnology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.6% versus −3.1% for Skyworks Solutions).
Skyworks Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.3% compared with 2.7% at Vishay Intertechnology.
Both pay dividends: Skyworks Solutions yields 2.4% and Vishay Intertechnology 1.5%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SWKS | VSH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.5B | $4.1B |
| Share price | $89.94 | $26.62 |
| Change, 1 year | 29.5% | 87.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −44.0% | 23.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 1.42 |
| Employees | 10K | 23K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 9 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 78.9× | 42.9× (better) |
| P/S | 3.4× | 1.2× (better) |
| P/B | 2.4× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 50.4× | 8.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 59.0× | 35.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.7% | 2.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $46.61 | $26.98 |
| Margin of safety | −93.0% | 1.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.1% | 17.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −5.0% | 4.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −63.9% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −63.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −33.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 40.8% (better) | 22.5% |
| Operating margin | 5.5% (better) | 5.2% |
| Net margin | 4.3% (better) | 2.7% |
| FCF margin | 5.8% (better) | 3.3% |
| Return on equity | 3.0% | 3.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.4% | 4.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.25 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −12.03 | −0.98 |
| Interest coverage | 5.2× (better) | 5.0× |
| Current ratio | 5.01 (better) | 3.31 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.97 (better) | 2.76 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% (better) | 1.5% |
| Payout ratio | 186% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.67% | 1.0% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.60% (better) | −0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.0% (better) | 1.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 122% | 99.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.49% | 1.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 (better) | −$594K |
| Short interest, % of float | 16.0% | 10.5% |
Go deeper
- SWKS stock overview
- SWKS income statement
- SWKS valuation and score
- VSH stock overview
- VSH income statement
- VSH valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.