Snowflake vs Veeva Systems
SNOW and VEEV side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SNOW and VEEV compare
Snowflake is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Veeva Systems ($108B against $50.7B).
Snowflake grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (32.0% versus 16.5% for Veeva Systems).
Veeva Systems keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.3% compared with −20.1% at Snowflake.
Veeva Systems scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 9 for Snowflake), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SNOW | VEEV |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $108B | $50.7B |
| Share price | $306.08 | $312.96 |
| Change, 1 year | 13.5% | 9.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −16.1% | −1.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.62 | 1.22 |
| Employees | 2,424 | 7,928 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 51.1× |
| P/S | 19.9× | 14.7× (better) |
| P/B | – | 6.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 42.0× |
| P/FCF | 90.3× | – |
| PEG | – | 2.33 |
| FCF yield | 1.1% | – |
| Fair value | – | $249.87 |
| Margin of safety | – | −25.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 32.0% (better) | 16.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 51.2% (better) | 16.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 25.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 25.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 18.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 67.0% | 75.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | −22.8% | 29.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −20.1% | 29.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 22.0% | – |
| Return on equity | −46.0% | 14.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 374% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −148.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.94 | 5.46 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 8.37 | 21.04 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.63% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.63% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 78.3% | 89.8% |
| Held by insiders | 2.8% | 0.89% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.2B | −$13.9M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.2% | 3.1% |
Go deeper
- SNOW stock overview
- SNOW income statement
- SNOW valuation and score
- VEEV stock overview
- VEEV income statement
- VEEV valuation and score
Other comparisons
- CRWD vs SNOW
- CRWV vs SNOW
- DOCU vs VEEV
- MDB vs SNOW
- NOW vs SNOW
- OTEX vs VEEV
- PLTR vs SNOW
- PTC vs VEEV
- SNOW vs TWLO
- SSNC vs VEEV
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.