ServiceNow vs Snowflake
NOW and SNOW side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NOW and SNOW compare
ServiceNow and Snowflake are about the same size, with market caps of $109B and $108B.
Snowflake grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (32.0% versus 22.2% for ServiceNow).
ServiceNow keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.3% compared with −20.1% at Snowflake.
ServiceNow scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 9 for Snowflake), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NOW | SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $109B | $108B |
| Share price | $105.12 | $306.08 |
| Change, 1 year | −42.3% | 13.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −24.0% | −16.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.51 | 1.62 |
| Employees | 26K | 2,424 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 | 4 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 65.7× | – |
| P/S | 7.4× (better) | 19.9× |
| P/B | 8.7× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 38.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 23.7× (better) | 90.3× |
| PEG | 0.89 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.2% (better) | 1.1% |
| Fair value | $75.75 | – |
| Margin of safety | −38.8% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 22.2% | 32.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 24.1% | 51.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 0.54% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 0.38% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 69.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 74.8% (better) | 67.0% |
| Operating margin | 11.4% (better) | −22.8% |
| Net margin | 11.3% (better) | −20.1% |
| FCF margin | 31.1% (better) | 22.0% |
| Return on equity | 14.2% (better) | −46.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 16.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.17 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.94 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −148.8× |
| Current ratio | 0.70 | 0.94 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.17 | 8.37 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 3.1% (better) | 0.63% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.1% (better) | 0.63% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.9% | 78.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.14% | 2.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.3M (better) | −$1.2B |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.9% | 5.2% |
Go deeper
- NOW stock overview
- NOW income statement
- NOW valuation and score
- SNOW stock overview
- SNOW income statement
- SNOW valuation and score
Other comparisons
- CRM vs NOW
- CRWD vs SNOW
- CRWV vs NOW
- CRWV vs SNOW
- MDB vs SNOW
- NOW vs ORCL
- NOW vs SSNC
- PLTR vs SNOW
- SNOW vs TWLO
- SNOW vs VEEV
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.