Snowflake vs Twilio
SNOW and TWLO side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SNOW and TWLO compare
Snowflake is the larger company, worth 3.4 times as much as Twilio ($108B against $31.5B).
Snowflake grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (32.0% versus 19.1% for Twilio).
Twilio keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 21.8% compared with −20.1% at Snowflake.
Twilio scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for Snowflake), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SNOW | TWLO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $108B | $31.5B |
| Share price | $306.08 | $205.03 |
| Change, 1 year | 13.5% | 83.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −16.1% | −34.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.62 | 1.93 |
| Employees | 2,424 | 5,587 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 25.8× |
| P/S | 19.9× | 5.4× (better) |
| P/B | – | 3.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 53.3× |
| P/FCF | 90.3× | – |
| FCF yield | 1.1% | – |
| Fair value | – | $149.03 |
| Margin of safety | – | −37.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 32.0% (better) | 19.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 51.2% (better) | 23.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 1793% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 1841% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 67.0% (better) | 48.6% |
| Operating margin | −22.8% | 6.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −20.1% | 21.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 22.0% | – |
| Return on equity | −46.0% | 14.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 6.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −148.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.94 | 4.47 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 8.37 | 9.79 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.63% | 2.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.63% | 2.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 78.3% | 90.3% |
| Held by insiders | 2.8% | 0.35% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.2B | −$608M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.2% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- SNOW stock overview
- SNOW income statement
- SNOW valuation and score
- TWLO stock overview
- TWLO income statement
- TWLO valuation and score
Other comparisons
- CRWD vs SNOW
- CRWV vs SNOW
- MDB vs SNOW
- NET vs TWLO
- NOW vs SNOW
- PLTR vs SNOW
- RBLX vs TWLO
- SNOW vs VEEV
- TEAM vs TWLO
- TWLO vs ZM
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.