SL Green Realty vs Vornado Realty Trust
SLG and VNO side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How SLG and VNO compare
Vornado Realty Trust is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as SL Green Realty ($6.5B against $3.5B).
SL Green Realty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.5% versus 1.4% for Vornado Realty Trust).
Vornado Realty Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.7% compared with −16.9% at SL Green Realty.
Both pay dividends: SL Green Realty yields 4.3% and Vornado Realty Trust 2.1%.
SL Green Realty scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 8 for Vornado Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | SLG | VNO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.5B | $6.5B |
| Share price | $49.00 | $34.71 |
| Change, 1 year | −1.7% | −1.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −35.0% | −21.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Employees | 1,289 | 3,145 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 1736× |
| P/S | 3.3× (better) | 3.5× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.4× (better) | 10.3× |
| Fair value | $87.91 | $35.09 |
| Margin of safety | 44.3% (better) | 1.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.5% (better) | 1.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.96% | 3.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −92.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −99.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 66.6% | – |
| Net margin | −16.9% | 3.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | −4.9% | 1.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 16.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.44 (better) | 0.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.3% (better) | 2.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −11.0% (better) | −20.8% |
| Buyback yield | 0.01% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.3% (better) | 2.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.3% | 99.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.36% | 8.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.6M | −$2.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 18.1% | – |
Go deeper
- SLG stock overview
- SLG income statement
- SLG valuation and score
- VNO stock overview
- VNO income statement
- VNO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.