OUTFRONT Media vs Vornado Realty Trust
OUT and VNO side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OUT and VNO compare
OUTFRONT Media and Vornado Realty Trust are about the same size, with market caps of $5.9B and $6.6B.
On earnings, OUTFRONT Media is cheaper: it trades at 23.1× trailing earnings, against 1760× for Vornado Realty Trust.
OUTFRONT Media grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.1% versus 1.4% for Vornado Realty Trust).
OUTFRONT Media keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.1% compared with 3.7% at Vornado Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: OUTFRONT Media yields 3.7% and Vornado Realty Trust 2.1%.
OUTFRONT Media scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Vornado Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OUT | VNO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.9B | $6.6B |
| Share price | $33.67 | $35.20 |
| Change, 1 year | 66.9% | −2.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 20.9% | −20.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.48 | 1.30 |
| Employees | 1,986 | 3,145 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.1× (better) | 1760× |
| P/S | 3.0× (better) | 3.6× |
| P/B | 8.4× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.0× | 10.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 17.2× | – |
| FCF yield | 5.8% | – |
| Fair value | $25.84 | $35.43 |
| Margin of safety | −30.3% | 0.64% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.1% (better) | 1.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.2% (better) | 3.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 108% (better) | −92.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 115% (better) | −99.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 20.7% | – |
| Net margin | 13.1% (better) | 3.7% |
| FCF margin | 17.4% | – |
| Return on equity | 41.4% (better) | 1.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 13.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.59 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.39 | – |
| Current ratio | 0.72 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.86 (better) | 0.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.7% (better) | 2.1% |
| Payout ratio | 84.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 25.9% (better) | −20.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.7% (better) | 2.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 99.5% |
| Held by insiders | 15.8% | 8.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.3M | −$2.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.2% | – |
Go deeper
- OUT stock overview
- OUT income statement
- OUT valuation and score
- VNO stock overview
- VNO income statement
- VNO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.