Raymond James Financial vs Stifel Financial
RJF and SF side by side, both in security brokers, dealers, and flotation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RJF and SF compare
Raymond James Financial is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Stifel Financial ($30.2B against $25.1B).
On earnings, Stifel Financial is cheaper: it trades at 11.9× trailing earnings, against 13.7× for Raymond James Financial.
Stifel Financial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.0% versus 8.0% for Raymond James Financial).
Stifel Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.3% compared with 13.6% at Raymond James Financial.
Both pay dividends: Raymond James Financial yields 1.4% and Stifel Financial 2.0%.
Raymond James Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 10 for Stifel Financial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RJF | SF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $30.2B | $25.1B |
| Share price | $157.22 | $66.69 |
| Change, 1 year | −0.65% | −14.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 57.2% | 33.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.09 | 1.21 |
| Employees | 20K | 9,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.7× | 11.9× (better) |
| P/S | 1.8× (better) | 3.7× |
| P/B | 2.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 11.1× |
| P/FCF | 21.0× (better) | 69.5× |
| PEG | 0.99 (better) | 3.58 |
| FCF yield | 4.8% (better) | 1.4% |
| Fair value | $177.00 | $71.15 |
| Margin of safety | 11.2% (better) | 6.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.0% | 11.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.3% (better) | 10.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 8.1% | 56.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.5% | 62.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 21.6% (better) | 7.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 13.6% | 14.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 8.5% (better) | 5.4% |
| Return on equity | 18.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.63 (better) | 0.54 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.4% | 2.0% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 15 (better) | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 15.0% | 32.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.4% | 3.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 78.9% | 36.8% |
| Held by insiders | 17.6% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$30.4M | −$423K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.1% | – |
Go deeper
- RJF stock overview
- RJF income statement
- RJF valuation and score
- SF stock overview
- SF income statement
- SF valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.