Rithm Capital vs Vornado Realty Trust
RITM and VNO side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RITM and VNO compare
Vornado Realty Trust is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Rithm Capital ($6.5B against $5.0B).
On earnings, Rithm Capital is cheaper: it trades at 14.2× trailing earnings, against 1736× for Vornado Realty Trust.
Rithm Capital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.0% versus 1.4% for Vornado Realty Trust).
Rithm Capital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.7% compared with 3.7% at Vornado Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: Rithm Capital yields 11.1% and Vornado Realty Trust 2.1%.
Rithm Capital scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 8 for Vornado Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RITM | VNO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.0B | $6.5B |
| Share price | $8.97 | $34.71 |
| Change, 1 year | −20.2% | −1.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −19.1% | −21.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.95 | 1.30 |
| Employees | 7,240 | 3,145 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.2× (better) | 1736× |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 3.5× |
| P/B | 0.6× (better) | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.0× (better) | 10.3× |
| Fair value | $16.83 | $35.09 |
| Margin of safety | 46.7% (better) | 1.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.0% (better) | 1.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 22.4% (better) | 3.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −44.9% (better) | −92.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −56.6% (better) | −99.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 8.7% (better) | 3.7% |
| Return on equity | 5.8% (better) | 1.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.16 | 0.23 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 11.1% (better) | 2.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 10.0% (better) | −20.8% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 11.1% (better) | 2.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 58.8% | 99.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.49% | 8.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.9M (better) | −$2.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.9% | – |
Go deeper
- RITM stock overview
- RITM income statement
- RITM valuation and score
- VNO stock overview
- VNO income statement
- VNO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.