Regency Centers vs Service Properties Trust
REG and SVC side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How REG and SVC compare
Regency Centers is the larger company, worth 19 times as much as Service Properties Trust ($13.9B against $738M).
Regency Centers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.2% versus −15.6% for Service Properties Trust).
Regency Centers keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.4% compared with −29.3% at Service Properties Trust.
Both pay dividends: Regency Centers yields 4.0% and Service Properties Trust 3.5%.
Regency Centers scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 5 for Service Properties Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | REG | SVC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.9B | $738M |
| Share price | $76.11 | $5.70 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.7% | −35.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 3.1% | −88.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.66 | 1.30 |
| Employees | 507 | 900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 8.6× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 2.0× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.8× | 3.5× (better) |
| Fair value | $69.18 | $9.93 |
| Margin of safety | −10.0% | 42.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.2% (better) | −15.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.9% (better) | 7.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 37.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 35.1% |
| Operating margin | 72.0% | – |
| Net margin | 34.4% (better) | −29.3% |
| Return on equity | 8.2% (better) | −68.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 13.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.82 (better) | 0.74 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.0% (better) | 3.5% |
| Payout ratio | 95.7% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 12 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 3.8% (better) | −41.2% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.10% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.0% (better) | 3.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 77.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.52% | 34.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$39.9M | $49.9M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 6.2% |
Go deeper
- REG stock overview
- REG income statement
- REG valuation and score
- SVC stock overview
- SVC income statement
- SVC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.