Palantir Technologies vs SS&C Technologies
PLTR and SSNC side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PLTR and SSNC compare
Palantir Technologies is the larger company, worth 23 times as much as SS&C Technologies ($442B against $18.9B).
On earnings, SS&C Technologies is cheaper: it trades at 23.2× trailing earnings, against 157× for Palantir Technologies.
Palantir Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (78.9% versus 8.6% for SS&C Technologies).
Palantir Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 49.0% compared with 13.2% at SS&C Technologies.
SS&C Technologies pays a dividend yielding 1.4%; Palantir Technologies does not pay one.
SS&C Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 14 for Palantir Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PLTR | SSNC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $442B | $18.9B |
| Share price | $184.11 | $80.39 |
| Change, 1 year | −7.4% | −3.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 608% | 3.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.17 | 0.93 |
| Employees | 4,429 | 29K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 157× | 23.2× (better) |
| P/S | 71.9× | 2.9× (better) |
| P/B | 45.3× | 2.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 163× | 11.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 132× | 10.8× (better) |
| PEG | – | 2.79 |
| FCF yield | 0.76% | 9.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $39.26 | $92.65 |
| Margin of safety | −369% | 13.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 78.9% (better) | 8.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 32.6% (better) | 6.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 295% (better) | 7.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 290% (better) | 9.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 6.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 84.8% (better) | 48.1% |
| Operating margin | 42.8% (better) | 23.6% |
| Net margin | 49.0% (better) | 13.2% |
| FCF margin | 54.6% (better) | 26.7% |
| Return on equity | 38.4% (better) | 12.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 1771% (better) | 9.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 1.14 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.15 |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.6× |
| Current ratio | 7.23 (better) | 1.06 |
| Altman Z-score | 150.05 (better) | 1.71 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 30.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 14.4% |
| Buyback yield | – | 6.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 7.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 60.3% | 86.3% |
| Held by insiders | 7.5% | 15.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$868M | −$13.5M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.5% | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- PLTR stock overview
- PLTR income statement
- PLTR valuation and score
- SSNC stock overview
- SSNC income statement
- SSNC valuation and score
Other comparisons
- CRWD vs PLTR
- CRWD vs SSNC
- CRWV vs PLTR
- DDOG vs PLTR
- NOW vs SSNC
- OCTV vs PLTR
- PLTR vs SNOW
- PLTR vs SNPS
- PLTR vs TEAM
- SSNC vs VEEV
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.