CoreWeave vs Palantir Technologies
CRWV and PLTR side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRWV and PLTR compare
Palantir Technologies is the larger company, worth 15 times as much as CoreWeave ($442B against $30.3B).
CoreWeave grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (115% versus 78.9% for Palantir Technologies).
Palantir Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 49.0% compared with −25.4% at CoreWeave.
Palantir Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 1 for CoreWeave), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRWV | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $30.3B | $442B |
| Share price | $54.87 | $184.11 |
| Change, 1 year | −60.8% | −7.4% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 608% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.87 | 2.17 |
| Employees | 2,189 | 4,429 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 157× |
| P/S | 4.0× (better) | 71.9× |
| P/B | 6.0× (better) | 45.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.6× (better) | 163× |
| P/FCF | – | 132× |
| FCF yield | −45.1% | 0.76% (better) |
| Fair value | $22.68 | $39.26 |
| Margin of safety | −142% (better) | −369% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 115% (better) | 78.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 32.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 295% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 290% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 67.4% | 84.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | −3.0% | 42.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −25.4% | 49.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | −180% | 54.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | −50.2% | 38.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −3.0% | 1771% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −0.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.46 | 7.23 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.09 | 150.05 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 72.3% | 60.3% |
| Held by insiders | 41.9% | 7.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.3B | −$868M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 18.7% | 2.5% |
Go deeper
- CRWV stock overview
- CRWV income statement
- CRWV valuation and score
- PLTR stock overview
- PLTR income statement
- PLTR valuation and score
Other comparisons
- CRWD vs PLTR
- CRWV vs NOW
- CRWV vs RBLX
- CRWV vs SNOW
- DDOG vs PLTR
- OCTV vs PLTR
- PLTR vs SNOW
- PLTR vs SNPS
- PLTR vs TEAM
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.