CrowdStrike vs SS&C Technologies
CRWD and SSNC side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRWD and SSNC compare
CrowdStrike is the larger company, worth 14 times as much as SS&C Technologies ($256B against $18.9B).
On earnings, SS&C Technologies is cheaper: it trades at 23.2× trailing earnings, against 4007× for CrowdStrike.
CrowdStrike grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.3% versus 8.6% for SS&C Technologies).
SS&C Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.2% compared with 1.1% at CrowdStrike.
SS&C Technologies pays a dividend yielding 1.4%; CrowdStrike does not pay one.
SS&C Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 12 for CrowdStrike), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRWD | SSNC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $256B | $18.9B |
| Share price | $250.43 | $80.39 |
| Change, 1 year | 83.6% | −3.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 266% | 3.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.69 | 0.93 |
| Employees | 11K | 29K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 4007× | 23.2× (better) |
| P/S | 47.5× | 2.9× (better) |
| P/B | 50.3× | 2.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 11.5× |
| P/FCF | 159× | 10.8× (better) |
| PEG | – | 2.79 |
| FCF yield | 0.63% | 9.3% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $92.65 |
| Margin of safety | – | 13.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.3% (better) | 8.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 40.6% (better) | 6.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 7.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 9.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 6.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 75.2% (better) | 48.1% |
| Operating margin | −2.2% | 23.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.1% | 13.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 29.8% (better) | 26.7% |
| Return on equity | 1.3% | 12.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −65.8% | 9.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.15 (better) | 1.14 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.15 |
| Interest coverage | −4.5× | 3.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.57 (better) | 1.06 |
| Altman Z-score | 22.87 (better) | 1.71 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 30.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 14.4% |
| Buyback yield | – | 6.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 7.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 75.4% | 86.3% |
| Held by insiders | 3.3% | 15.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$641M | −$13.5M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- CRWD stock overview
- CRWD income statement
- CRWD valuation and score
- SSNC stock overview
- SSNC income statement
- SSNC valuation and score
Other comparisons
- CRWD vs GEN
- CRWD vs NET
- CRWD vs OKTA
- CRWD vs OTEX
- CRWD vs PLTR
- CRWD vs S
- CRWD vs SNOW
- CRWD vs ZS
- NOW vs SSNC
- SSNC vs VEEV
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.