Lamar Advertising vs OUTFRONT Media
LAMR and OUT side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LAMR and OUT compare
Lamar Advertising is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as OUTFRONT Media ($16.0B against $5.6B).
On earnings, OUTFRONT Media is cheaper: it trades at 23.0× trailing earnings, against 28.7× for Lamar Advertising.
OUTFRONT Media grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.6% versus 4.4% for Lamar Advertising).
Lamar Advertising keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 23.9% compared with 12.7% at OUTFRONT Media.
Both pay dividends: Lamar Advertising yields 4.2% and OUTFRONT Media 3.8%.
Lamar Advertising scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for OUTFRONT Media), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LAMR | OUT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.0B | $5.6B |
| Share price | $157.53 | $32.00 |
| Change, 1 year | 35.3% | 87.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 29.7% | 10.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.03 | 1.48 |
| Employees | 3,500 | 1,986 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.7× | 23.0× (better) |
| P/S | 6.9× | 2.9× (better) |
| P/B | – | 8.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.1× | 14.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 22.3× | 18.6× (better) |
| PEG | 2.81 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.5% | 5.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $112.74 | $24.93 |
| Margin of safety | −39.7% | −28.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.4% | 7.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.6% | 8.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 26.6% | 128% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 27.4% | 136% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 19.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 67.4% | – |
| Operating margin | 31.8% (better) | 20.5% |
| Net margin | 23.9% (better) | 12.7% |
| FCF margin | 30.9% (better) | 15.7% |
| Return on equity | – | 39.7% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 12.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 3.65 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.20 (better) | 4.55 |
| Interest coverage | 4.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.63 | 0.67 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.00 (better) | 0.80 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.2% (better) | 3.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 86.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 20.9% | 25.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −0.10% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.1% (better) | 3.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.4% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 13.7% | 19.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.7M (better) | −$4.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.9% | 6.8% |
Go deeper
- LAMR stock overview
- LAMR income statement
- LAMR valuation and score
- OUT stock overview
- OUT income statement
- OUT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.