Oppenheimer vs Stifel Financial
OPY and SF side by side, both in security brokers, dealers, and flotation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OPY and SF compare
Stifel Financial is the larger company, worth 27 times as much as Oppenheimer ($25.1B against $923M).
On earnings, Oppenheimer is cheaper: it trades at 11.6× trailing earnings, against 11.9× for Stifel Financial.
Oppenheimer grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.9% versus 11.0% for Stifel Financial).
Stifel Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.3% compared with 4.9% at Oppenheimer.
Both pay dividends: Oppenheimer yields 0.88% and Stifel Financial 2.0%.
Oppenheimer scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 10 for Stifel Financial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OPY | SF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $923M | $25.1B |
| Share price | $86.20 | $66.69 |
| Change, 1 year | 25.3% | −14.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 62.2% | 33.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 1.21 |
| Employees | 2,947 | 9,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.6× (better) | 11.9× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 3.7× |
| P/B | 0.9× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.1× (better) | 11.1× |
| P/FCF | 16.1× (better) | 69.5× |
| PEG | 0.16 (better) | 3.58 |
| FCF yield | 6.2% (better) | 1.4% |
| Fair value | $114.09 | $71.15 |
| Margin of safety | 24.4% (better) | 6.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.9% (better) | 11.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.4% | 10.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 2.2% | 56.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −0.94% | 62.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.0% | 7.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 7.2% | – |
| Net margin | 4.9% | 14.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.3% | 5.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 9.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.04 (better) | 0.54 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | 2.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 21.5% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | 8 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −13.4% | 32.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.25% | 1.3% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.1% | 3.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 41.7% | 36.8% |
| Held by insiders | 6.0% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$420K (better) | −$423K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.98% | – |
Go deeper
- OPY stock overview
- OPY income statement
- OPY valuation and score
- SF stock overview
- SF income statement
- SF valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.