MaxLinear vs Rambus
MXL and RMBS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MXL and RMBS compare
Rambus is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as MaxLinear ($9.2B against $6.1B).
MaxLinear grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (50.5% versus 17.2% for Rambus).
Rambus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 31.7% compared with −18.2% at MaxLinear.
Rambus scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for MaxLinear), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MXL | RMBS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.1B | $9.2B |
| Share price | $67.47 | $84.65 |
| Change, 1 year | 344% | −24.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −0.21% | 253% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.02 | 1.72 |
| Employees | 1,115 | 791 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 38.8× |
| P/S | 10.8× (better) | 12.1× |
| P/B | 12.6× | 6.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 29.8× |
| P/FCF | 1850× | 30.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.05% | 3.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $21.37 | $79.26 |
| Margin of safety | −216% | −6.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 50.5% (better) | 17.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.46% | 23.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 4.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 3.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 57.5% | 79.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | −13.6% | 35.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −18.2% | 31.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.58% | 39.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | −21.3% | 17.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −11.7% | 34.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.26 | – |
| Interest coverage | −8.2× | 225× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.78 | 9.75 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 10.52 | 39.74 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −0.09% | 0.05% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −0.09% | 0.05% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 82.3% | 92.8% |
| Held by insiders | 2.3% | 0.77% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$60.1M | −$20.5M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.5% | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- MXL stock overview
- MXL income statement
- MXL valuation and score
- RMBS stock overview
- RMBS income statement
- RMBS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.