MaxLinear vs Sitime
MXL and SITM side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MXL and SITM compare
Sitime is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as MaxLinear ($13.4B against $6.1B).
Sitime grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (83.0% versus 50.5% for MaxLinear).
Sitime keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.0% compared with −18.2% at MaxLinear.
Sitime scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for MaxLinear), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MXL | SITM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.1B | $13.4B |
| Share price | $67.47 | $447.06 |
| Change, 1 year | 344% | 61.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −0.21% | 55.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.02 | 2.65 |
| Employees | 1,115 | 441 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 894× |
| P/S | 10.8× (better) | 28.7× |
| P/B | 12.6× (better) | 13.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 406× |
| P/FCF | 1850× | 159× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.05% | 0.63% (better) |
| Fair value | $21.37 | $49.21 |
| Margin of safety | −216% (better) | −808% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 50.5% | 83.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.46% | 23.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 57.5% | 58.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | −13.6% | −3.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −18.2% | 3.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.58% | 18.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | −21.3% | 1.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −11.7% (better) | −110% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.26 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −8.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.78 | 19.45 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 10.52 (better) | 6.46 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −0.09% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −0.09% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 82.3% | 75.5% |
| Held by insiders | 2.3% | 26.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$60.1M (better) | −$501M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.5% | 6.8% |
Go deeper
- MXL stock overview
- MXL income statement
- MXL valuation and score
- SITM stock overview
- SITM income statement
- SITM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.