Lattice Semiconductor vs MaxLinear
LSCC and MXL side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LSCC and MXL compare
Lattice Semiconductor is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as MaxLinear ($13.2B against $6.1B).
MaxLinear grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (50.5% versus 33.3% for Lattice Semiconductor).
Lattice Semiconductor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.6% compared with −18.2% at MaxLinear.
Lattice Semiconductor scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 7 for MaxLinear), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LSCC | MXL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.2B | $6.1B |
| Share price | $92.97 | $67.47 |
| Change, 1 year | 25.8% | 344% |
| Change, 5 years | 13.4% | −0.21% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.85 | 2.02 |
| Employees | 1,174 | 1,115 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 358× | – |
| P/S | 20.3× | 10.8× (better) |
| P/B | 16.8× | 12.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 272× | – |
| P/FCF | 66.4× (better) | 1850× |
| FCF yield | 1.5% (better) | 0.05% |
| Fair value | $10.99 | $21.37 |
| Margin of safety | −746% | −216% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 33.3% | 50.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.1% (better) | −0.46% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 13.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −43.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 69.0% (better) | 57.5% |
| Operating margin | 7.4% (better) | −13.6% |
| Net margin | 5.6% (better) | −18.2% |
| FCF margin | 30.6% (better) | 0.58% |
| Return on equity | 4.9% (better) | −21.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.5% (better) | −11.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.26 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | −8.2× |
| Current ratio | 3.02 (better) | 1.78 |
| Altman Z-score | 43.55 (better) | 10.52 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.27% (better) | −0.09% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.27% (better) | −0.09% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 82.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.92% | 2.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$18.6M (better) | −$60.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.7% | 5.5% |
Go deeper
- LSCC stock overview
- LSCC income statement
- LSCC valuation and score
- MXL stock overview
- MXL income statement
- MXL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.