Marvell Technology vs Texas Instruments
MRVL and TXN side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MRVL and TXN compare
Texas Instruments is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Marvell Technology ($275B against $172B).
On earnings, Texas Instruments is cheaper: it trades at 45.8× trailing earnings, against 64.8× for Marvell Technology.
Marvell Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (30.6% versus 16.7% for Texas Instruments).
Texas Instruments keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 31.1% compared with 27.9% at Marvell Technology.
Both pay dividends: Marvell Technology yields 0.12% and Texas Instruments 2.4%.
Marvell Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 13 for Texas Instruments), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MRVL | TXN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $172B | $275B |
| Share price | $196.40 | $300.84 |
| Change, 1 year | 118% | 87.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 173% | 55.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.99 | 1.12 |
| Employees | 7,480 | 33K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 13 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 64.8× | 45.8× (better) |
| P/S | 18.2× | 14.1× (better) |
| P/B | 9.3× (better) | 15.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 111× | 38.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 99.5× | 51.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.0% | 1.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $75.71 | $190.34 |
| Margin of safety | −159% | −58.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 30.6% (better) | 16.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 22.5% (better) | 4.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 20.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 20.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −1.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 52.2% | 58.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 16.5% | 37.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 27.9% | 31.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 18.3% | 27.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 16.5% | 35.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.8% | 25.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.27 (better) | 0.78 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.66 (better) | 0.97 |
| Interest coverage | 7.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.17 | 4.86 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 12.30 | 12.92 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 2.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 7.9% | 84.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | 8.1% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 1.1% (better) | 0.26% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% | 2.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 79.7% | 89.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.37% | 0.16% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$49.6M (better) | −$119M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 8 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.8% | 2.2% |
Go deeper
- MRVL stock overview
- MRVL income statement
- MRVL valuation and score
- TXN stock overview
- TXN income statement
- TXN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.