Mercury Systems vs Vicor
MRCY and VICR side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MRCY and VICR compare
Vicor is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Mercury Systems ($8.8B against $4.7B).
Vicor grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (81.8% versus 7.9% for Mercury Systems).
Vicor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.8% compared with −3.0% at Mercury Systems.
Vicor scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 5 for Mercury Systems), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MRCY | VICR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.7B | $8.8B |
| Share price | $77.54 | $191.09 |
| Change, 1 year | 0.13% | 110% |
| Change, 5 years | 49.1% | 23.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.98 | 1.98 |
| Employees | 2,102 | 1,092 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 61.2× |
| P/S | 4.7× (better) | 11.4× |
| P/B | 3.1× (better) | 10.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 61.0× (better) | 76.3× |
| P/FCF | 68.5× (better) | 172× |
| PEG | – | 0.93 |
| FCF yield | 1.5% (better) | 0.58% |
| Fair value | $34.78 | $108.51 |
| Margin of safety | −123% | −76.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.9% | 81.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.3% | 8.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 122% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 115% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 44.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.6% | 34.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 0.03% | 11.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −3.0% | 18.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.9% (better) | 6.6% |
| Return on equity | −2.0% | 20.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 0.02% | 27.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 0.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.96 | 13.25 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.24 | 91.53 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.32% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.32% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 109% | 47.6% |
| Held by insiders | 8.3% | 46.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$194M (better) | −$399M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.1% | 9.7% |
Go deeper
- MRCY stock overview
- MRCY income statement
- MRCY valuation and score
- VICR stock overview
- VICR income statement
- VICR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.