Lattice Semiconductor vs Sitime
LSCC and SITM side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LSCC and SITM compare
Lattice Semiconductor and Sitime are about the same size, with market caps of $13.2B and $13.4B.
On earnings, Lattice Semiconductor is cheaper: it trades at 358× trailing earnings, against 894× for Sitime.
Sitime grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (83.0% versus 33.3% for Lattice Semiconductor).
Lattice Semiconductor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.6% compared with 3.0% at Sitime.
Lattice Semiconductor scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 10 for Sitime), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LSCC | SITM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.2B | $13.4B |
| Share price | $92.97 | $447.06 |
| Change, 1 year | 25.8% | 61.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 13.4% | 55.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.85 | 2.65 |
| Employees | 1,174 | 441 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 358× (better) | 894× |
| P/S | 20.3× (better) | 28.7× |
| P/B | 16.8× | 13.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 272× (better) | 406× |
| P/FCF | 66.4× (better) | 159× |
| FCF yield | 1.5% (better) | 0.63% |
| Fair value | $10.99 | $49.21 |
| Margin of safety | −746% (better) | −808% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 33.3% | 83.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.1% | 23.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 13.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −43.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 69.0% (better) | 58.7% |
| Operating margin | 7.4% (better) | −3.9% |
| Net margin | 5.6% (better) | 3.0% |
| FCF margin | 30.6% (better) | 18.1% |
| Return on equity | 4.9% (better) | 1.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.5% (better) | −110% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 3.02 | 19.45 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 43.55 (better) | 6.46 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.27% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.27% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 75.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.92% | 26.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$18.6M (better) | −$501M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.7% | 6.8% |
Go deeper
- LSCC stock overview
- LSCC income statement
- LSCC valuation and score
- SITM stock overview
- SITM income statement
- SITM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.