Kodiak Gas Services vs Kinetik
KGS and KNTK side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KGS and KNTK compare
Kinetik is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Kodiak Gas Services ($9.2B against $4.7B).
On earnings, Kinetik is cheaper: it trades at 19.0× trailing earnings, against 55.8× for Kodiak Gas Services.
Kinetik grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.1% versus 8.2% for Kodiak Gas Services).
Kinetik keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.4% compared with 5.8% at Kodiak Gas Services.
Both pay dividends: Kodiak Gas Services yields 4.2% and Kinetik 4.3%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KGS | KNTK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.7B | $9.2B |
| Share price | $46.86 | $56.60 |
| Change, 1 year | 29.6% | 50.1% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 72.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 0.58 |
| Employees | 1,300 | 500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 7 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 55.8× | 19.0× (better) |
| P/S | 3.4× (better) | 4.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.9× (better) | 21.9× |
| P/FCF | 946× | 58.6× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.89 |
| FCF yield | 0.11% | 1.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $36.01 | $39.78 |
| Margin of safety | −30.1% (better) | −42.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.2% | 14.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 33.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −3.5% | 222% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −10.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 63.8% (better) | 55.9% |
| Operating margin | 27.4% (better) | 10.5% |
| Net margin | 5.8% | 10.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.36% | 8.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 7.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.86 (better) | 6.53 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.9× |
| Current ratio | 1.45 (better) | 0.68 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.37 (better) | 1.28 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.2% | 4.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 218% | 107% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.0% (better) | 4.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 44.1% |
| Held by insiders | 73.8% | 13.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$674M | −$318M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 31.5% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- KGS stock overview
- KGS income statement
- KGS valuation and score
- KNTK stock overview
- KNTK income statement
- KNTK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.