Jack Henry & Associates vs Waystar
JKHY and WAY side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JKHY and WAY compare
Jack Henry & Associates is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Waystar ($11.3B against $5.4B).
On earnings, Jack Henry & Associates is cheaper: it trades at 23.1× trailing earnings, against 40.0× for Waystar.
Waystar grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.2% versus 7.1% for Jack Henry & Associates).
Jack Henry & Associates keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.8% compared with 11.2% at Waystar.
Jack Henry & Associates pays a dividend yielding 1.5%; Waystar does not pay one.
Jack Henry & Associates scores higher on the StockData Score (24 against 12 for Waystar), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JKHY | WAY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.3B | $5.4B |
| Share price | $161.34 | $28.00 |
| Change, 1 year | 7.6% | −29.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 1.9% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.45 | 0.94 |
| Employees | 7,300 | 340 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 24 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 4 | 4 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.1× (better) | 40.0× |
| P/S | 4.4× (better) | 4.5× |
| P/B | 5.5× | 1.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.8× | 15.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 16.3× (better) | 21.8× |
| PEG | 1.99 | – |
| FCF yield | 6.1% (better) | 4.6% |
| Fair value | $182.31 | $29.74 |
| Margin of safety | 11.5% (better) | 5.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.1% | 19.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 10.3% | 56.8% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 11.9% | 45.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 43.7% | 69.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 25.0% (better) | 22.9% |
| Net margin | 19.8% (better) | 11.2% |
| FCF margin | 27.3% (better) | 20.4% |
| Return on equity | 24.0% (better) | 3.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 24.0% (better) | 4.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.37 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.95 |
| Current ratio | 1.17 | 1.85 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 9.36 (better) | 2.11 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.5% | – |
| Payout ratio | 33.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 17 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 6.0% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.4% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.1% | 110% |
| Held by insiders | 0.61% | 63.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.2M (better) | −$8.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.9% | 22.9% |
Go deeper
- JKHY stock overview
- JKHY income statement
- JKHY valuation and score
- WAY stock overview
- WAY income statement
- WAY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.