Jack Henry & Associates vs Unisys
JKHY and UIS side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JKHY and UIS compare
Jack Henry & Associates is the larger company, worth 59 times as much as Unisys ($11.3B against $190M).
Jack Henry & Associates grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.1% versus −0.61% for Unisys).
Jack Henry & Associates keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.8% compared with −21.7% at Unisys.
Jack Henry & Associates pays a dividend yielding 1.5%; Unisys does not pay one.
Jack Henry & Associates scores higher on the StockData Score (24 against 4 for Unisys), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JKHY | UIS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.3B | $190M |
| Share price | $161.34 | $2.61 |
| Change, 1 year | 7.6% | −26.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 1.9% | −87.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.45 | 1.40 |
| Employees | 7,300 | 17K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 24 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.1× | – |
| P/S | 4.4× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 5.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.8× | 12.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 16.3× | 2.5× (better) |
| PEG | 1.99 | – |
| FCF yield | 6.1% | 40.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $182.31 | – |
| Margin of safety | 11.5% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.1% (better) | −0.61% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% (better) | −0.76% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 10.3% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 11.9% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 43.7% (better) | 27.8% |
| Operating margin | 25.0% (better) | 1.4% |
| Net margin | 19.8% (better) | −21.7% |
| FCF margin | 27.3% (better) | 3.9% |
| Return on equity | 24.0% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 24.0% (better) | 19.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 8.53 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.17 | 1.41 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 9.36 (better) | −0.75 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.5% | – |
| Payout ratio | 33.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 17 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 6.0% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.4% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.1% | 79.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.61% | 11.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.2M | −$667K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.9% | 8.7% |
Go deeper
- JKHY stock overview
- JKHY income statement
- JKHY valuation and score
- UIS stock overview
- UIS income statement
- UIS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.