ChipMOS Technologies vs Marvell Technology
IMOS and MRVL side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IMOS and MRVL compare
Marvell Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (30.6% versus 5.5% for ChipMOS Technologies).
Marvell Technology pays a dividend yielding 0.15%; ChipMOS Technologies does not pay one.
Marvell Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 2 for ChipMOS Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IMOS | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $137B |
| Share price | $49.22 | $156.76 |
| Change, 1 year | 91.1% | 75.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 45.2% | 110% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.17 | 2.07 |
| Employees | 651 | 7,480 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 51.7× |
| P/S | – | 14.5× |
| P/B | – | 7.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 88.7× |
| P/FCF | – | 79.5× |
| FCF yield | – | 1.3% |
| Fair value | – | $72.22 |
| Margin of safety | – | −117% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.5% | 30.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.79% | 22.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.8% | 52.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.8% | 16.5% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 27.9% |
| FCF margin | 0.61% | 18.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 16.5% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 6.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.27 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.10 (better) | 0.66 |
| Interest coverage | 3.8× | 7.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.40 | 3.17 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 9.99 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.15% |
| Payout ratio | – | 7.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.4% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 1.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.39% | 79.7% |
| Held by insiders | 2.0% | 0.37% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$57.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 3.0% |
Go deeper
- IMOS stock overview
- IMOS income statement
- IMOS valuation and score
- MRVL stock overview
- MRVL income statement
- MRVL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.