Hartford Insurance vs Progressive
HIG and PGR side by side, both in fire, marine, and casualty insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HIG and PGR compare
Progressive is the larger company, worth 3.7 times as much as Hartford Insurance ($134B against $35.9B).
On earnings, Hartford Insurance is cheaper: it trades at 8.6× trailing earnings, against 11.6× for Progressive.
Progressive grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.5% versus 7.0% for Hartford Insurance).
Hartford Insurance keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.0% compared with 12.8% at Progressive.
Both pay dividends: Hartford Insurance yields 1.8% and Progressive 6.0%.
Hartford Insurance scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 15 for Progressive), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HIG | PGR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $35.9B | $134B |
| Share price | $132.59 | $231.28 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.4% | 11.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 84.6% | 141% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.54 | 0.43 |
| Employees | 19K | 70K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 15 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 8.6× (better) | 11.6× |
| P/S | 1.2× (better) | 1.5× |
| P/B | 1.8× (better) | 3.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3× | – |
| P/FCF | 6.1× (better) | 8.4× |
| PEG | 0.25 | 0.08 (better) |
| FCF yield | 16.4% (better) | 11.9% |
| Fair value | $149.44 | $249.05 |
| Margin of safety | 11.3% (better) | 7.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.0% | 10.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.7% | 15.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 34.5% (better) | 12.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 40.3% (better) | 12.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 22.9% (better) | 14.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 15.0% (better) | 12.8% |
| FCF margin | 20.2% (better) | 17.5% |
| Return on equity | 23.5% | 34.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 1.07 | 1.98 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.8% | 6.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 14.3% | 69.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 10.7% | 23.2% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 4.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.6% (better) | 6.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.4% | 87.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.35% | 0.26% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$56.5M | −$31.0M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 6 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.5% | 1.2% |
Go deeper
- HIG stock overview
- HIG income statement
- HIG valuation and score
- PGR stock overview
- PGR income statement
- PGR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.