Howard Hughes vs Vornado Realty Trust
HHH and VNO side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HHH and VNO compare
Vornado Realty Trust is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Howard Hughes ($6.5B against $5.0B).
On earnings, Howard Hughes is cheaper: it trades at 32.8× trailing earnings, against 1736× for Vornado Realty Trust.
Howard Hughes grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (42.8% versus 1.4% for Vornado Realty Trust).
Howard Hughes keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.5% compared with 3.7% at Vornado Realty Trust.
Vornado Realty Trust pays a dividend yielding 2.1%; Howard Hughes does not pay one.
Vornado Realty Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for Howard Hughes), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HHH | VNO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.0B | $6.5B |
| Share price | $83.02 | $34.71 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.5% | −1.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −5.2% | −21.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.08 | 1.30 |
| Employees | 500 | 3,145 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 32.8× (better) | 1736× |
| P/S | 1.9× (better) | 3.5× |
| P/B | 1.2× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.2× (better) | 10.3× |
| Fair value | $84.89 | $35.09 |
| Margin of safety | 2.2% (better) | 1.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 42.8% (better) | 1.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 3.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −37.5% (better) | −92.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −50.7% (better) | −99.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 18.1% | – |
| Net margin | 6.5% (better) | 3.7% |
| Return on equity | 4.4% (better) | 1.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 21.3% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 2.6× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.53 (better) | 0.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −20.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.6% | 99.5% |
| Held by insiders | 94.9% | 8.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.0M (better) | −$2.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 182% | – |
Go deeper
- HHH stock overview
- HHH income statement
- HHH valuation and score
- VNO stock overview
- VNO income statement
- VNO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.