Great Southern Bancorp vs MetroCity Bankshares
GSBC and MCBS side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GSBC and MCBS compare
MetroCity Bankshares is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Great Southern Bancorp ($1.0B against $885M).
On earnings, MetroCity Bankshares is cheaper: it trades at 12.5× trailing earnings, against 13.5× for Great Southern Bancorp.
MetroCity Bankshares grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.7% versus −0.05% for Great Southern Bancorp).
MetroCity Bankshares keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 43.8% compared with 29.7% at Great Southern Bancorp.
Both pay dividends: Great Southern Bancorp yields 2.1% and MetroCity Bankshares 2.3%.
MetroCity Bankshares scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 6 for Great Southern Bancorp), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GSBC | MCBS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $885M | $1.0B |
| Share price | $81.23 | $35.86 |
| Change, 1 year | 44.4% | 40.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 39.1% | 38.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.48 | 0.79 |
| Employees | 1,075 | 317 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.5× | 12.5× (better) |
| P/S | 3.9× (better) | 5.7× |
| P/B | 1.4× (better) | 1.8× |
| P/FCF | 19.8× | – |
| PEG | 14.52 | 4.68 (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.0% | – |
| Fair value | $70.38 | $31.16 |
| Margin of safety | −15.4% | −15.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.05% | 24.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.6% | 10.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −1.6% | 20.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2.6% | 12.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 8.0% | 13.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 29.7% | 43.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 19.7% | – |
| Return on equity | 10.6% | 15.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 0.15 | 0.33 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% | 2.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 28.0% | 36.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −6.8% | – |
| Buyback yield | 5.6% (better) | 0.69% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.7% (better) | 3.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 51.6% | 26.8% |
| Held by insiders | 16.1% | 28.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.2M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.0% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- GSBC stock overview
- GSBC income statement
- GSBC valuation and score
- MCBS stock overview
- MCBS income statement
- MCBS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.